Apocalyptica’s Eicca Toppinen recently defended Metallica’s controversial ‘St. Anger’ album. He explained why metal fans should reconsider their opinion of the record in an interview with Pipeman Radio.

Toppinen addressed the common criticisms of the album’s production and sound. He drew parallels to black metal’s intentionally raw aesthetic.

“I understand that people have had difficulties with ‘St. Anger’, because the sound was not approachable,” Toppinen said. “[Like] black metal — it’s not meant to sound nice. Original Norwegian black metal, it’s all about how shitty you can record things to make them honest, raw and brutal. That’s how black metal is done originally.”

-Partnership-

The cellist emphasized that the album’s harsh production was intentional and authentic to Metallica’s metal roots.

“And that’s what ‘St. Anger’ has. It’s an honest f*cking [slice] of anger. That’s what it’s about. And people were expecting something nice and smooth. And f*ck that. Metallica is a metal band,” he continued. “But at the same time, I have to say, I like some songs on ‘Load’ or ‘ReLoad’. I think they are great songs. It’s a different quality.”

Toppinen also discussed Apocalyptica’s own interpretation of the title track for their ‘Apocalyptica Plays Metallica, Vol. 2’ album.

“What I’m saying to the audience when we play [the] ‘St. Anger’ [title track during Apocalyptica shows], because we made a version of that [for ‘Apocalyptica Plays Metallica, Vol. 2’], which, I think, the version is really cool, and it’s doing really justice on how good song it is,” he explained.

The musician concluded by encouraging listeners to revisit the album with fresh perspective in today’s musical landscape.

“Today I always recommend people to give it a new spin now after the time because in the sound where we live at the moment, everything is over-polished and hygienically nice. ‘St. Anger’, actually, the production sounds f*cking refreshing,” Toppinen said. “So whoever is listening to this, take ‘St. Anger’ and listen to it. It’s a wonderful album.”

Toppinen’s defense of the album comes more than two decades after its release. ‘St. Anger’ became one of Metallica’s most divisive records among fans and critics alike during this time.

Wikipedia reported that the album received highly polarizing reviews upon its 2003 release. Critics and fans were divided over its raw, abrasive production style. The record holds a score of 65/100 on Metacritic, reflecting the mixed critical reception that has followed it throughout its history.

Despite the controversial reception, Wikipedia noted that ‘St. Anger’ achieved significant commercial success. It debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard 200 and sold 417,000 copies in its first week. The album was later certified 2x platinum in the United States and has sold approximately 6 million copies worldwide. This proved that commercial success and critical acclaim don’t always align.

Apocalyptica’s connection to Metallica’s catalog runs deep. The Finnish cello metal band built much of their early reputation on classical interpretations of the thrash metal legends’ songs. Metallica Wiki documented that Apocalyptica included their reworked version of “St. Anger” on ‘Apocalyptica Plays Metallica Vol. 2’. This continued their long-running tradition of reimagining Metallica’s compositions through their unique classical and cello-driven approach.

The band’s interpretation of “St. Anger” represents part of their broader mission to demonstrate the underlying songwriting strength of Metallica’s compositions, regardless of their original production choices. Through their classical arrangements, Apocalyptica has consistently shown how strong melodies and song structures can transcend production styles and genre boundaries.