Stephen A. Smith Criticizes Angel Reese Over Michael Jordan Comparison: “She’s No Caitlin Clark”

In the ever-evolving landscape of women’s basketball, few moments spark as much debate and discussion as comparisons between current stars and the legends who paved the way.

Recently, ESPN’s outspoken commentator Stephen A. Smith ignited a firestorm of conversation when he publicly criticized Chicago Sky rookie Angel Reese after she appeared to draw parallels between herself and NBA icon Michael Jordan.

Smith’s pointed remarks, specifically his assertion that “she’s no Caitlin Clark,” have sent shockwaves through the sports world, prompting heated debates among fans, analysts, and players alike.

The Origin of the Controversy

The controversy began when Angel Reese, a standout forward who rose to national prominence during her collegiate career at LSU, made comments in an interview that some interpreted as comparing her own impact on the game to that of Michael Jordan.

While Reese’s intention may have been to express her confidence and ambition, her words were quickly picked up by mainstream media outlets and dissected on social platforms.

Enter Stephen A. Smith, a veteran journalist and analyst known for his candid and often polarizing opinions.

On a recent segment of ESPN’s “First Take,” Smith addressed Reese’s comments head-on. He did not mince words, critiquing both the substance and the timing of Reese’s comparison.

Stephen A. Smith’s Take: “She’s NO Caitlin Clark”

Smith’s central argument revolved around the notion that Reese, while certainly talented, has not yet reached the level of influence or accomplishment necessary to warrant comparisons to Michael Jordan.

“Let’s be clear,” Smith began, “Michael Jordan is the greatest basketball player of all time.

His impact on the sport is unmatched, and his legacy is cemented not just in championships, but in how he changed the game globally.

For Angel Reese to even mention herself in the same breath as MJ is, frankly, premature.”

Smith went on to contrast Reese’s early professional performance with that of Caitlin Clark, the Indiana Fever rookie who has taken the WNBA by storm.

“If we’re talking about transformative players in women’s basketball right now, Caitlin Clark is the name that comes to mind.

h

She’s breaking records, drawing massive crowds, and elevating the profile of the league in ways we haven’t seen in years. Angel Reese is a great player, but she’s not Caitlin Clark. Not yet.”

The Reaction: Fans and Analysts Weigh In

Smith’s comments quickly became a trending topic on Twitter, with fans and fellow analysts chiming in from all angles.

Supporters of Reese defended her confidence, pointing out her impressive collegiate resume, which includes a national championship and numerous individual accolades.

Others agreed with Smith, arguing that Reese still has much to prove at the professional level before she can be mentioned alongside basketball royalty.

Caitlin Clark herself has largely stayed out of the fray, focusing instead on her own game and the challenges of her rookie season.

However, the comparison between Clark and Reese has been a recurring theme since both entered the league, with each player bringing a unique style and personality to the court.

Angel Reese: Rising Star With a Champion’s Mentality

It’s important to contextualize Reese’s comments within the broader narrative of her career.

Known for her fierce competitiveness and unapologetic self-assurance, Reese has never shied away from the spotlight.

Her journey from Baltimore to LSU was marked by adversity and triumph, culminating in a national championship victory that catapulted her into the national conversation.

Since joining the Chicago Sky, Reese has continued to showcase her skills, averaging double-digit points and rebounds while earning praise for her work ethic and leadership.

She has also become a role model for young athletes, particularly Black girls who see themselves reflected in her journey.

The Michael Jordan Comparison: Confidence or Overreach?

Comparisons to Michael Jordan are not uncommon in the world of sports, but they are rarely made by the athletes themselves.

Jordan’s legacy is defined by six NBA championships, five MVP awards, and a competitive drive that set him apart from his peers.

For Reese, invoking Jordan’s name may have been an attempt to express her aspirations rather than a direct comparison of achievements.

Nevertheless, Smith’s critique highlights a broader tension in sports media: the fine line between confidence and perceived arrogance.

For young athletes, especially women of color, expressing self-belief can sometimes be met with disproportionate scrutiny.

Caitlin Clark: The Standard Bearer?

Smith’s assertion that “she’s no Caitlin Clark” underscores the unique position Clark occupies in the current WNBA landscape.

The former Iowa Hawkeyes star has shattered scoring records and drawn unprecedented attention to women’s basketball, both at the collegiate and professional levels.

Her style of play—marked by deep three-pointers and creative passing—has endeared her to fans and made her a fixture in highlight reels.

While Clark and Reese are often pitted against each other in media narratives, both have expressed respect for one another’s talents.

Their rivalry, real or perceived, has only served to elevate the profile of the WNBA in a crowded sports marketplace.

The Bigger Picture: Women’s Basketball on the Rise

Beyond the specifics of Smith’s critique, the conversation about Angel Reese, Caitlin Clark, and Michael Jordan speaks to the rapid growth of women’s basketball.

The 2024 WNBA season has seen record-breaking attendance, increased television ratings, and a surge of interest from sponsors and fans alike.

Players like Reese and Clark are at the forefront of this movement, using their platforms to inspire the next generation.

Smith’s comments, while controversial, reflect the heightened scrutiny and expectations that come with increased visibility.

As women’s basketball continues to ascend, debates about legacy, greatness, and impact will only intensify.

 The Debate Continues

In the end, the question of whether Angel Reese deserves to be compared to Michael Jordan—or whether she measures up to Caitlin Clark—is ultimately subjective.

What is clear, however, is that both Reese and Clark are generational talents who are reshaping the narrative around women’s sports.

Stephen A. Smith’s critique may have been harsh, but it is a testament to the passion and investment that fans and analysts now bring to the women’s game.

As the season progresses, all eyes will be on Reese, Clark, and their peers to see how they respond to the ever-present spotlight.

One thing is certain: the future of women’s basketball has never been brighter.