The controversy surrounding American Eagle’s ‘Sydney Sweeney has great jeans’ advertising campaign broke out in late July, but now it’s mid-August and public opinion has yet to cool down.
Sydney Sweeney in an American Eagle ad – Photo: American Eagle
According to Fashion Network magazine , most recently, on August 16, MC Phil McGraw was so angry when he saw many people criticizing Sydney Sweeney’s advertisement that he declared he would buy American Eagle jeans for all the women in his family.
But perhaps this is just the latest chapter in the history of the debate over the meaning of jeans, which is inevitable when so many people think the world’s most popular and recognizable garment belongs to them.
How were jeans born?
The name associated with the birth of jeans is the entrepreneur Levi Strauss. In 1873, a customer of his – tailor Jacob Davis in a Nevada mining town – came to him with an idea.
Jacob Davis says he made sturdy pants from denim he bought from Levi Strauss and decorated them with metal rivets. The pants quickly became popular with miners. The two later expanded their business, founding a company to sell the pants to miners and cowboys who needed clothing that could withstand the rigors of the job.
Levi Strauss and tailor Jacob Davis combined copper rivets with denim to create the first industrially produced overalls in 1873 – Photo: Levi’s
Soon other companies jumped on board, and over the next half century, jeans spread among working-class people across America.
Take a look at iconic photos of American workers during the Great Depression (1929-1939): one striking feature is that almost everyone is wearing jeans or close variations like denim overalls or overalls. That was the uniform of the masses, of those working in factories and fields.
Also during that decade, a new trend emerged and signaled an important turning point: jeans began to be “culturally appropriated” to become a fashion statement .
The upper class at that time favored jeans because they wanted to experience the cowboy life – Photo: The Wall Street Journal
The pioneers were the upper class, who flocked to the ranches in the West to experience the cowboy lifestyle. From there, the “Dude Ranch Duds” fashion was born, led by the brand Levi Strauss & Co. In 1934, the company even launched its first line of jeans for women: Lady Levi’s.
As a result, jeans became a popular item to assert the wearer’s identity. In particular, actor Marlon Brando was one of the most enthusiastic promoters of jeans fashion, to the point that he wore them everywhere. Receptionists and talent scouts in Hollywood even mistook him for someone who came to fix a plumber or clean windows.
Marlon Brando brought his personal style to the screen, starting with The Wild One, where he played the leader of a small town’s biker gang wearing jeans. The image quickly won over the white middle class, especially high school and college students, who flocked to imitate it. But for the older generation, the trend was annoying – Photo: Britannica
Cultural appropriation debates have raged over the years.
In 1957, the New York Times reported that jeans, once considered a healthy garment, had fallen into disrepute. “Since the youth began to wear jeans in a casual way, many schools across the country have banned their students from wearing them in the classroom,” the newspaper reported.
By the 1960s, the rebellious power of jeans exploded, especially as they became the uniform of the counterculture movement.
Female welders wearing denim overalls on their way to work, circa 1943, at the Todd Erie Basin dry dock – Photo: Stocktrek Images
Feminists chose jeans over skirts to demand gender equality, and civil rights activists also wore jeans because they evoked the denim once associated with slaves and sharecroppers – a subtle reminder that segregation in the American South had not disappeared.
From there, the “jeans wars” escalated. In 1980, the straight-leg style of jeans became associated with moral decadence in the eyes of some. That same year, 15-year-old model Brooke Shields appeared in a series of sexually explicit Calvin Klein jeans ads , sparking a backlash from conservatives.
The 40th President of the United States Ronald Reagan is often associated with the image of a “rancher” wearing blue jeans – Photo: Wikiwand
At that time, a wave of conservative backlash began to recapture jeans. After Ronald Reagan became president, he built an image of a true “rancher” most comfortable in his familiar blue jeans . Under George W. Bush, this image continued to be maintained and reinforced, making jeans a familiar symbol for conservatives.
So, Fashion Network magazine believes that the controversy surrounding Sydney Sweeney ‘s advertisement is not new, this is just a small part of the controversy about jeans and this cultural war will continue in the future.
News
Many untold details about Hollywood’s most scandalous divorce between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard are revealed in the new book “Hollywood Vampires”
‘Love Actually’: The Truth About Johnny Depp and Amber Heard’s Love Story Many untold details about Hollywood’s most scandalous divorce…
Brooke Hogan responds to ‘sarcastic’ claims that she is using the death of her father, Hulk Hogan, to gain attention
Brooke Hogan Shuts Down Critics Claiming She’s Using Dad Hulk Hogan’s Death for Attention Vince Bucci/Getty Images Brooke Hogan is setting…
Margaret Qualley ‘punished’ Jimmy Fallon to ‘lie down for an interview’ when he was asked an ‘extremely difficult’ question on the game “Truth or Dare”: “How many people have you slept with?”
Margaret Qualley Convinces Jimmy Fallon to Interview Her While Laying Face-Down on His Desk | Video But that’s just because…
CBS Skips 10th Anniversary Celebration for Stephen Colbert
Amid all the hand-wringing, finger-pointing, and high and low dudgeon over the Stephen Colbert saga at CBS, something has gone completely overlooked:…
Conan O’Brien foresees the end of late-night TV, predicts bold prediction on Stephen Colbert’s future
Former ‘Tonight Show’ host says Colbert is ‘too talented and too essential to go away’ Conan O’Brien said late night…
Can you believe it?? His assets are far less than Elon Musk’s, but the cost of protecting this billionaire is more than 50 times that of the Tesla boss, higher than the combined cost of 6 famous technology CEOs.
Mark Zuckerberg – CEO and founder of Meta – is being protected at a level unprecedented in the tech world,…
End of content
No more pages to load